<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Netexpertise &#187; failover</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.netexpertise.eu/en/tag/failover/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.netexpertise.eu/en</link>
	<description>Systems &#38; Networks</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2011 14:59:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Multipathed iSCSI SAN Disks on Linux</title>
		<link>http://www.netexpertise.eu/en/linux/multipathed-iscsi-san-disks-on-linux.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.netexpertise.eu/en/linux/multipathed-iscsi-san-disks-on-linux.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jan 2011 11:08:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dave</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[failover]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iSCSI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[load-balance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LVM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MSA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[multipath]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[redhat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SAN]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.netexpertise.eu/en/?p=724</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here are a few steps to configure iSCSI disks on Linux. Although I set this up on a Redhat Enterprise 5.5 connected to an HP MSA 2012i, the whole configuration remains generic and can be applied to any SAN. I will add another post to check how both Linux and Windows perform on the same [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.netexpertise.eu/en/linux/multipathed-iscsi-san-disks-on-linux.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>File server cluster on Windows 2003 Server Standard Edition</title>
		<link>http://www.netexpertise.eu/en/windows/file-servers-cluster-on-windows-2003-server-standard-edition.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.netexpertise.eu/en/windows/file-servers-cluster-on-windows-2003-server-standard-edition.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 14:33:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dave</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2003 server]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cluster]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[disk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DOS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[failover]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[file server]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nbtstat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[netbios]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[netbt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[redondant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[script]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[share]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[standard edition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[volume]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.netexpertise.eu/en/?p=378</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Most of us already know cluster features aren&#8217;t provided on Windows 2003 server Standard Edition. The thing is you&#8217;ve got a shared storage space but you can&#8217;t (or don&#8217;t want to) afford 2 Windows Enterprise licences just for a file server. There is DFS indeed but one acknowledge it is a pity to replicate data [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.netexpertise.eu/en/windows/file-servers-cluster-on-windows-2003-server-standard-edition.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Channel Bonding on Linux</title>
		<link>http://www.netexpertise.eu/en/linux/channel-bonding-linux.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.netexpertise.eu/en/linux/channel-bonding-linux.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 13:02:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dave</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bonding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[channel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[failover]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interface]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[load-balance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[port]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[redhat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[truncking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.netexpertise.eu/en/?p=195</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Channel bonding &#8211; or port truncking &#8211; gives the ability to apply a policy to a group of network interfaces. It is then possible to load-balance the traffic accross different ports, or keep one aside for failover. &#160; Module Loading Declare the channel bonding bond0 interface into /etc/modprobe.conf # Channel Bonding alias bond0 bonding options [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.netexpertise.eu/en/linux/channel-bonding-linux.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

