<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Daily Accounting in Freeradius</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.netexpertise.eu/en/freeradius/daily-accounting.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.netexpertise.eu/en/freeradius/daily-accounting.html</link>
	<description>Systems &#38; Networks</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Jun 2010 15:40:24 +0200</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: dave</title>
		<link>http://www.netexpertise.eu/en/freeradius/daily-accounting.html/comment-page-1#comment-1100</link>
		<dc:creator>dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 16:32:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://netexpertise/en/?p=26#comment-1100</guid>
		<description>Hi, what makes you tell this isn&#039;t for FR2?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, what makes you tell this isn&#8217;t for FR2?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jo King</title>
		<link>http://www.netexpertise.eu/en/freeradius/daily-accounting.html/comment-page-1#comment-1099</link>
		<dc:creator>Jo King</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 15:37:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://netexpertise/en/?p=26#comment-1099</guid>
		<description>Can you please write update version of this article based on FreeRadius 2</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can you please write update version of this article based on FreeRadius 2</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dave</title>
		<link>http://www.netexpertise.eu/en/freeradius/daily-accounting.html/comment-page-1#comment-734</link>
		<dc:creator>dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2009 17:49:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://netexpertise/en/?p=26#comment-734</guid>
		<description>Hi Marcelo,

You&#039;re right and I did think about the trigger solution but was still in beta version at the time I wrote this

I wouldn&#039;t say it is easier but a clear advantage is it needs no change in Freeradius. That&#039;s no bother anyway since SQL code in Freeradius isn&#039;t modified much.
On the other hand, it&#039;s annoying to store twice the same data and it gets confusing to have 2 accounting tables.

In the end, the 2 solutions let everyone come closer to the right amount of traffic limiting packet loss impact on the network and get a better picture of customer&#039;s usage

Thanks for this great suggestion
Dave</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Marcelo,</p>
<p>You&#8217;re right and I did think about the trigger solution but was still in beta version at the time I wrote this</p>
<p>I wouldn&#8217;t say it is easier but a clear advantage is it needs no change in Freeradius. That&#8217;s no bother anyway since SQL code in Freeradius isn&#8217;t modified much.<br />
On the other hand, it&#8217;s annoying to store twice the same data and it gets confusing to have 2 accounting tables.</p>
<p>In the end, the 2 solutions let everyone come closer to the right amount of traffic limiting packet loss impact on the network and get a better picture of customer&#8217;s usage</p>
<p>Thanks for this great suggestion<br />
Dave</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
