<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Netexpertise &#187; Mysql</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.netexpertise.eu/en/category/mysql/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.netexpertise.eu/en</link>
	<description>Systems &#38; Networks</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 12:51:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Mysql Ultra-Fast Backup with LVM</title>
		<link>http://www.netexpertise.eu/en/mysql/mysql-ultra-fast-backup-with-lvm.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.netexpertise.eu/en/mysql/mysql-ultra-fast-backup-with-lvm.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 13:17:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dave</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Mysql]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[backup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[logical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LVM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[manager]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[snapshot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[volume]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://netexpertise/en/?p=84</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[





It is generally good practice to respect the two following points when backing up databases. The backup has to be:

consistent
fast

Consistency is easily achieved putting a read lock on all tables beforehands. However, this isn&#8217;t always applied, and WILL definately lead to a database integrity problem at some stage.
Once a lock has been set on the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.netexpertise.eu/en/mysql/mysql-ultra-fast-backup-with-lvm.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mysql Traffic Encryption with OpenSSL</title>
		<link>http://www.netexpertise.eu/en/freeradius/mysql-traffic-encryption-with-openssl.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.netexpertise.eu/en/freeradius/mysql-traffic-encryption-with-openssl.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dave</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Freeradius]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mysql]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Database]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[encrypt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[encryption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Openssl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[radius]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[secure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SSL]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://netexpertise/en/?p=48</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[





This is related to Freeradius software but can be applied to any application that needs to encrypt Mysql traffic. Freeradius is compliant to Radius protocol characteristics, which give ability to accomplish various actions, such as authenticate users. Number of caveats have been found, not related to the software but to the protocol. Joshua Hill from [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.netexpertise.eu/en/freeradius/mysql-traffic-encryption-with-openssl.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mysql or Postgres for Freeradius?</title>
		<link>http://www.netexpertise.eu/en/freeradius/mysql-or-postgres-for-freeradius.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.netexpertise.eu/en/freeradius/mysql-or-postgres-for-freeradius.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dave</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Freeradius]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mysql]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Postgresql]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[benchmark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comparison]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Database]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[radius]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://netexpertise/en/?p=30</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[





We are not trying to build a full comparative of Mysql and Postgresql in this article. This subject has been discussed many times et everyone has his own opinion on this. Some directions may be given and only a few critirias will be analysed to be used with Freeradius.
Criterias
If we check what&#8217;s already been done [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.netexpertise.eu/en/freeradius/mysql-or-postgres-for-freeradius.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
